relationship_id,subject_entity_id,relationship_type,object_entity_id,confidence,rationale,source_id,review_status,period_id
230,ENT_EGY_NUN,spouse_of,ENT_EGY_NAUNET,high,Nun and Naunet form a male/female Ogdoad pair.,SRC_WILKINSON_EGYPTIAN_GODS,reviewed,
235,ENT_EGY_NUN,member_of,ENT_EGY_OGDOAD,high,Nun is one of the Ogdoad.,SRC_WILKINSON_EGYPTIAN_GODS,reviewed,
2431,ENT_EGY_NUN,aligned_with,ENT_MES_APSU,medium,"Nun and Apsu are the two nearest cross-cultural parallels for the concept of the primordial male freshwater/undifferentiated-water abyss from which creation emerges: Nun is the Egyptian primordial watery chaos (gendered male), while Apsu is the Akkadian primordial freshwater ocean (also gendered male) who mingles with Tiamat (salt water) to produce the first gods in the Enuma Elish. Both Nun and Apsu represent the primordial water-before-creation as an existential category, both are gendered male, and both precede and enable the creation of the ordered cosmos. The parallel is widely noted in comparative cosmogony scholarship. Confidence medium: both are independently developed primordial water deities with no direct historical connection; the parallel is structural/typological. Pinch (2002) pp. 167-168.",SRC_PINCH_EGYPTIAN_MYTH,reviewed,PER_EGY_OLD_KINGDOM
2432,ENT_EGY_NUN,aligned_with,ENT_MES_NAMMU,medium,"Nun (Egyptian primordial watery abyss) and Nammu (Sumerian primordial sea-goddess, ""the mother who gave birth to heaven and earth,"" Atrahasis Prologue; Enki and Ninhursag) are structurally parallel as the primordial undifferentiated water from which creation emerges and from which the creator deity is born. The parallel is noted in standard works on comparative ancient Near Eastern cosmogony. Key difference: Nun is gendered male; Nammu is gendered female (the Great Mother of Sumerian theology). Despite the gender inversion, both serve as the primordial creative matrix — the undifferentiated watery whole that precedes and enables creation. Confidence medium: independently developed traditions; structural parallel without direct historical connection. Pinch (2002) pp. 167-168.",SRC_PINCH_EGYPTIAN_MYTH,reviewed,PER_EGY_OLD_KINGDOM