entity_relationships: 1388

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

This data as json

relationship_id	subject_entity_id	relationship_type	object_entity_id	confidence	rationale	source_id	review_status	period_id
1388	ENT_ZOR_ANGRA_MAINYU	received_as	ENT_ISR_SATAN	medium	In early Hebrew texts, "the satan" (the accuser) is a member of Yahweh's heavenly court (Job 1–2; Zechariah 3:1–2) — not an independent cosmic evil. The development of Satan as an independent adversarial power opposing God (1 Enoch 6–11; Jubilees 10; later Revelation) parallels the Zoroastrian Angra Mainyu (cosmic adversary of Ahura Mazda, independent evil principle). Jews under Persian/Achaemenid rule (6th–4th c. BCE) had direct access to Zoroastrian theology; Boyce and DDD_BIBLE s.v. "Satan" both discuss the probable structural influence. Confidence medium: the development could be endogenous; the influence is probable but not textually demonstrable.	SRC_BOYCE_ZOROASTRIANS	reviewed	PER_ISR_EXILIC