✦ DeityDB
Browse Graph Connections Timeline Lineages Path Map Queries About Collaborate API GitHub ↗

entity_relationships: 1534

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

This data as json

relationship_id subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
1534 ENT_HTT_TELIPINU received_as ENT_DEMETER low The Telipinu vanishing-deity myth and the Demeter/Kore myth share the same narrative logic: (1) a deity associated with vegetation and fertility withdraws or disappears; (2) all crops, animals, and fertility fail during the absence; (3) the divine community searches and eventually recovers the missing deity; (4) fertility and life return with the deity's restoration. West (1997) identifies the Telipinu myth as the Hittite version of this pan-Near Eastern pattern, and treats it as a probable intermediate between the Mesopotamian Dumuzi/Tammuz dying-deity narrative and the Greek Demeter/Persephone myth. The transmission route would be through Anatolian-Greek contact in the Archaic period. Confidence low because the Telipinu myth has the deity vanishing in anger (not dying or being abducted), which is structurally slightly different from Persephone's abduction by Hades; the convergence is in the effect (vegetation fails) rather than the mechanism. SRC_WEST_EAST_HELICON reviewed PER_GRK_ARCHAIC
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 155.23ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb