entity_relationships: 1596

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

This data as json

relationship_id	subject_entity_id	relationship_type	object_entity_id	confidence	rationale	source_id	review_status	period_id
1596	ENT_MES_INANNA_ISHTAR	received_as	ENT_APHRODITE	medium	Inanna/Ishtar transmits directly to Aphrodite via the Cypriot channel, alongside the more fully documented Inanna→Astarte→Aphrodite chain already in the dataset. The key shared elements: (1) the "Queen of Heaven" title (Inanna is consistently "Queen of Heaven"; Aphrodite Ourania is "Heavenly Aphrodite"); (2) the planet Venus as the primary celestial identification (both are the morning/evening star deity); (3) the love-war combination (both are goddesses of erotic love and of war and conflict — an unusual combination that marks the Mesopotamian influence); (4) the Cypriot cult of Aphrodite at Paphos showing direct Eastern religious influence; (5) the Adonis/Tammuz link — Adonis is the Greek reception of Dumuzi, Inanna/Ishtar's divine lover, and the Adonis cult is deeply Cypriot. Burkert (1992) and West (1997) both treat this as a well-grounded direct channel.	SRC_BURKERT_ORIENT_REV	reviewed	PER_GRK_ARCHAIC