✦ DeityDB
Browse Graph Connections Timeline Lineages Path Map Queries About Collaborate API GitHub ↗

entity_relationships: 2384

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

This data as json

relationship_id subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
2384 ENT_PHRYG_MATAR reception_of ENT_LUW_KUBABA high The Phrygian "Matar Kubileya" (Mother Kubileya) directly incorporates the name Kubaba of Carchemish in her epithet "Kubileya" — the phonological shift Kubaba → Kubileya is a regular Phrygian adaptation of the Luwian theonym. This is one of the most etymologically secure deity receptions in Anatolian religious history. The transmission route is geographic: the Luwian/Neo-Hittite states of SE Anatolia (principally Carchemish) bordered and influenced the Phrygian highlands, and the adoption of Kubaba's name and enthroned-queen-with-lion iconography into the Phrygian Matar tradition is consistent with the archaeological and linguistic evidence. Combined with the already-existing ENT_CYBELE reception_of ENT_PHRYG_MATAR, this relationship completes the chain: Kubaba → Matar Kubileya → Cybele. Roller (1999) pp. 67-79; Taracha (2009) p. 194. SRC_ROLLER_CYBELE reviewed PER_PHRYG_IRON_AGE
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 79.366ms · Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb