entity_relationships: 2390

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

This data as json

relationship_id	subject_entity_id	relationship_type	object_entity_id	confidence	rationale	source_id	review_status	period_id
2390	ENT_ELAM_KIRIRISHA	aligned_with	ENT_MES_INANNA_ISHTAR	medium	Kiririsha and Inanna/Ishtar are parallel as the dominant great goddesses of neighboring ancient Near Eastern civilizations — both are "the great goddess" of their respective traditions, both combine fertility, sovereignty, and protection functions, and both absorbed the titles and iconographic features of earlier mother goddess traditions. During periods of strong Mesopotamian cultural influence on Elam (especially the Old Elamite period of Ur III contact), Kiririsha assimilated some Inanna/Ninhursag characteristics. Confidence medium: they are parallel rather than equated, and their theological programs differ significantly in detail. Potts (1999) p. 288; Carter & Stolper (1984) p. 42.	SRC_POTTS_ELAM	reviewed	PER_ELAM_CLASSICAL