Relationships
Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb
- subject_entity_id
- {'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
- relationship_type
- {'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
- object_entity_id
- {'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
- confidence
- {'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
- rationale
- {'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
- source_id
- {'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
- period_id
- {'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}
7 rows where object_entity_id = "ENT_SYN_MITHRAS"
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: relationship_type, confidence, source_id
| relationship_id ▼ | subject_entity_id | relationship_type | object_entity_id | confidence | rationale | source_id | review_status | period_id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1438 | Mithra ENT_ZOR_MITHRA | received_as | Mithras ENT_SYN_MITHRAS | medium | The Roman mystery cult deity Mithras is the reception of the Iranian/Zoroastrian Mithra (Avestan: Miθra, "covenant/contract"). Both are solar-associated figures of light, truth, and the cosmic struggle against darkness. The Roman cult (1st–4th c. CE) shares iconographic elements (Mithra/Mithras slaying a bull; solar associations; military popularity) and the name is directly cognate. Scholarly debate persists on the degree of continuity: Cumont argued direct inheritance from Iranian religion; Ulansey (1989) and Merkelbach (1984) argued for substantial Roman innovation. Medium confidence: the name and some attributes are continuous; the degree of doctrinal transmission is disputed. | Mary Boyce, Zoroastrians SRC_BOYCE_ZOROASTRIANS | reviewed | Late Antiquity PER_LATE_ANTIQUE |
| 2906 | Sol Invictus ENT_ROM_SOL_INVICTUS | syncretized_with | Mithras ENT_SYN_MITHRAS | medium | In late antiquity Sol Invictus and Mithras are closely identified (Sol Invictus Mithras). | Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum (Latin votive and dedicatory inscriptions) SRC_CIL | reviewed | |
| 7249 | Cautes ENT_MITH_CAUTES | associated_with | Mithras ENT_SYN_MITHRAS | high | Cautes is an attendant torchbearer of Mithras within the cult scene. Clauss ch.9. | Manfred Clauss, The Roman Cult of Mithras: The God and His Mysteries (tr. R. Gordon, Routledge 2000) SRC_CLAUSS_MITHRAS | reviewed | |
| 7250 | Cautopates ENT_MITH_CAUTOPATES | associated_with | Mithras ENT_SYN_MITHRAS | high | Cautopates is an attendant torchbearer of Mithras within the cult scene. Clauss ch.9. | Manfred Clauss, The Roman Cult of Mithras: The God and His Mysteries (tr. R. Gordon, Routledge 2000) SRC_CLAUSS_MITHRAS | reviewed | |
| 7251 | Petra Genetrix ENT_MITH_PETRA_GENETRIX | creator_of | Mithras ENT_SYN_MITHRAS | high | Mithras is the petrogenes, born from the petra genetrix; the rock is the source of his cosmogonic birth. Clauss ch.6. | Manfred Clauss, The Roman Cult of Mithras: The God and His Mysteries (tr. R. Gordon, Routledge 2000) SRC_CLAUSS_MITHRAS | reviewed | |
| 7252 | Tauroctony ENT_MITH_TAUROCTONY | associated_with | Mithras ENT_SYN_MITHRAS | high | The tauroctony depicts Mithras himself slaying the bull; the scene is inseparable from the god. Beck. | Roger Beck, The Religion of the Mithras Cult in the Roman Empire: Mysteries of the Unconquered Sun (Oxford 2006) SRC_BECK_MITHRAS | reviewed | |
| 7309 | Apollo-Mithras-Helios-Hermes ENT_COMM_APOLLO_MITHRAS_HELIOS_HERMES | syncretized_with | Mithras ENT_SYN_MITHRAS | medium | The Commagenian Apollo-Mithras-Helios-Hermes is a key early attestation of the Mithras whose cult later developed in the Roman world. | Versluys, M.J. — Visual Style and Constructing Identity in the Hellenistic World: Nemrud Dag and Commagene under Antiochos I (Cambridge, 2017) SRC_VERSLUYS_COMMAGENE | reviewed |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
[relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
[relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
[object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
[confidence] TEXT,
[rationale] TEXT,
[source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
[review_status] TEXT,
[period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);