Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

2 rows where object_entity_id = "ENT_THRA_ZALMOXIS"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
2323 Gebeleizis ENT_THRA_GEBELEIZIS aligned_with Zalmoxis ENT_THRA_ZALMOXIS low In Herodotus 4.94-96 the transition from the Gebeleizis passage to the Zalmoxis account is abrupt, leading some scholars (Coman 1938; Eliade 1970) to interpret the two names as aspects of the same Getae deity — sky/storm aspect (Gebeleizis) vs. mystery/afterlife aspect (Zalmoxis). Archibald (1998) p. 300 treats them as potentially distinct. Low confidence given the single attestation of Gebeleizis and unclear ancient relationship. Zosia H. Archibald, The Odrysian Kingdom of Thrace: Orpheus Unmasked (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998) SRC_ARCHIBALD_ODRYSIAN reviewed Thracian Iron Age and Classical Period PER_THRA_IRON_AGE
2452 Derzelas ENT_DAC_DERZELAS aligned_with Zalmoxis ENT_THRA_ZALMOXIS medium Derzelas and Zalmoxis share the chthonic-vitalistic function characteristic of Dacian-Thracian religion: Zalmoxis promises immortality and receives the dead in his underground hall; Derzelas presides over vital abundance and health with a chthonic dimension. Both are attested in the Thracian-Dacian cultural zone and represent the indigenous Dacian synthesis of chthonic death-power with vital life-force. The alignment is functional and regional rather than attested by an explicit ancient identification. Popov (1989) discusses Derzelas's chthonic dimension in relation to the broader Thracian divine complex. Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES reviewed Thracian Iron Age and Classical Period PER_THRA_IRON_AGE

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);