Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

12 rows where period_id = "PER_GRK_CLASSICAL"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: subject_entity_id, relationship_type, object_entity_id, confidence, source_id, review_status

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
1464 Amun ENT_EGY_AMUN received_as Zeus Ammon ENT_SYN_ZEUS_AMMON high Zeus-Ammon (Ζεὺς Ἄμμων) is one of the earliest and most documented cases of interpretatio graeca: Herodotus (2.42, c. 450 BCE) explicitly identifies Zeus with the Libyan-Egyptian Amun, noting that the Egyptians "call Zeus Amun." The Oracle of Ammon at Siwa was visited by Croesus, consulted by Cimon, and most famously by Alexander the Great in 331 BCE (who used the identification politically to claim divine parentage). Pindar composed a hymn to Ammon (fr. 36). Plutarch (De Is. ch. 9) also discusses the identification. The syncretic figure Zeus-Ammon was then depicted as Zeus with ram's horns (Amun's attribute). Plutarch, On Isis and Osiris (De Iside et Osiride, c. 100–120 CE) SRC_PLUTARCH_ISIS_OSIRIS reviewed Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
1465 Zeus Ammon ENT_SYN_ZEUS_AMMON reception_of Amun ENT_EGY_AMUN high Zeus-Ammon as the Greco-Egyptian reception of Egyptian Amun; identified with Zeus by Herodotus (2.42); the ram's horns of the syncretic figure are Amun's attribute. Plutarch, On Isis and Osiris (De Iside et Osiride, c. 100–120 CE) SRC_PLUTARCH_ISIS_OSIRIS reviewed Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
1466 Zeus ENT_ZEUS received_as Zeus Ammon ENT_SYN_ZEUS_AMMON high Zeus as the Greek partner in the Zeus-Ammon syncretism; Herodotus (2.42) makes the identification explicit. The Zeus-Ammon figure inherits Zeus's supreme deity status and Olympian authority in the syncretic complex. Plutarch, On Isis and Osiris (De Iside et Osiride, c. 100–120 CE) SRC_PLUTARCH_ISIS_OSIRIS reviewed Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
1467 Zeus Ammon ENT_SYN_ZEUS_AMMON reception_of Zeus ENT_ZEUS high Zeus-Ammon as the Greco-Egyptian reception of Zeus; the Olympian high-god identified with Amun by Herodotus; Zeus's divine sovereignty received into the syncretic figure. Plutarch, On Isis and Osiris (De Iside et Osiride, c. 100–120 CE) SRC_PLUTARCH_ISIS_OSIRIS reviewed Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
1468 Hathor ENT_EGY_HATHOR equated_with Aphrodite ENT_APHRODITE medium [RETYPED v2.1.60 received_as->equated_with, re-sourced Plutarch->Herodotus: the ancient testimony is the Aphrodite temple in the cow-goddess city — "the name of the city is Atarbechis, and in it there is set up a holy temple of Aphrodite" (Hdt 2.41, trans. Macaulay, PG #2707, verified verbatim 2026-07-01); Atarbechis = Egyptian Per-Hathor (Wilkinson). Equation via interpretatio; the derivation channel for Aphrodite is already recorded via the Astarte/Ishtar edges.] Herodotus (2.41, c. 450 BCE) explicitly equates Aphrodite with Hathor, noting that "what the Greeks call Aphrodite Urania, the Egyptians call the same goddess Isis." The identification rests on shared domains (love, beauty, music, dance, fertility) and the sacred cow (Hathor's primary animal; Aphrodite's connection to Cyprus where cattle sacrifice was prominent). Plutarch (De Is. ch. 57) also discusses the identification. Note: this adds an Egyptian source for Aphrodite alongside the Canaanite Astarte chain already in the DB — both Hathor and Astarte contributed to the Aphrodite complex. Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES needs_review Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
1469 Aphrodite ENT_APHRODITE equated_with Hathor ENT_EGY_HATHOR medium [RETYPED v2.1.60 reception_of->equated_with, re-sourced Plutarch->Herodotus: mirror of edge 1468 (Hdt 2.41 Atarbechis temple of Aphrodite, verified verbatim 2026-07-01); Greek Aphrodite does not derive from Hathor.] Aphrodite as Greek reception of Egyptian Hathor via interpretatio graeca; Herodotus 2.41 equates them; shared domains of love, beauty, music, and the sacred cow. Second source of Aphrodite alongside Canaanite Astarte. Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES needs_review Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
1512 Eshmun ENT_PHO_ESHMUN received_as Asclepius ENT_ASCLEPIUS high The Eshmun→Asclepius identification is extensively documented. The great Eshmun sanctuary north of Sidon — a major healing temple complex with a sacred spring — was described by Greek and Roman writers as an Asclepion, establishing a direct religious identification. The Eshmunazar II sarcophagus inscription (c. 450 BCE) names Eshmun explicitly as Sidon's chief healing deity. Philo of Byblos (c. 100 CE, citing Sanchuniathon) identifies the Phoenician healing deity with Asclepius. Pausanias notes the "Sidonian" character of Asclepius. Both Eshmun and Asclepius preside over healing sanctuaries with sacred springs, receive offerings from the sick, and are described as divine physicians. Glenn Markoe, Phoenicians (London: British Museum Press / University of California Press, 2000) SRC_MARKOE_PHOENICIANS reviewed Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
8034 Osiris ENT_EGY_OSIRIS equated_with Dionysus ENT_DIONYSUS high Ancient interpretatio, in Herodotus's own voice: "except only Isis and Osiris (who they say is Dionysos)" (Hdt 2.42) and "Now Osiris in the tongue of Hellas is Dionysos" (Hdt 2.144; trans. Macaulay, PG #2707, both verified verbatim 2026-07-01). Also Plutarch, De Iside 35 (trans. Babbitt, Loeb 1936, PD): "That Osiris is identical with Dionysus who could more fittingly know than yourself, Clea?" (verified against LacusCurtius 2026-07-01); cf. De Iside 13. Encoded equated_with per policy — an ancient author equates; no derivation asserted. [v2.1.60] Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES needs_review Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
8035 Isis ENT_EGY_ISIS equated_with Demeter ENT_DEMETER high Ancient interpretatio: "now Isis is in the tongue of the Hellenes Demeter" (Hdt 2.59; trans. Macaulay, PG #2707, verified verbatim 2026-07-01); cf. Hdt 2.156 "Demeter is Isis". Encoded equated_with per policy. [v2.1.60] Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES needs_review Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
8036 Horus ENT_EGY_HORUS equated_with Apollo ENT_APOLLO high Ancient interpretatio: "Oros the son of Osiris, whom the Hellenes call Apollo" (Hdt 2.144) and "in the Egyptian tongue Apollo is Oros" (Hdt 2.156; trans. Macaulay, PG #2707, both verified verbatim 2026-07-01). Encoded equated_with per policy. [v2.1.60] Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES needs_review Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
8037 Bastet ENT_EGY_BASTET equated_with Artemis ENT_ARTEMIS high Ancient interpretatio: "Now Bubastis in the Hellenic tongue is Artemis" (Hdt 2.137) and "Artemis is Bubastis" (Hdt 2.156; trans. Macaulay, PG #2707, both verified verbatim 2026-07-01). Boubastis is Bastet, mistress of Bubastis. Encoded equated_with per policy. [v2.1.60] Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES needs_review Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL
8038 Wadjet ENT_EGY_WADJET equated_with Leto ENT_LETO medium Ancient interpretatio at Buto: "This Oracle which is in Egypt is sacred to Leto, and it is established in a great city near that mouth of the Nile which is called Sebennytic" (Hdt 2.155) and Leto as nurse of Apollo/Horus on the floating island (Hdt 2.156; trans. Macaulay, PG #2707, verified verbatim 2026-07-01). Herodotus never names the Egyptian goddess; her identification as Wadjet, mistress of Buto (Per-Wadjet), is modern Egyptology (Wilkinson, Complete Gods and Goddesses, s.v. Wadjet) — hence MEDIUM. [v2.1.60] Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES needs_review Classical Period PER_GRK_CLASSICAL

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);