Relationships
Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb
- subject_entity_id
- {'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
- relationship_type
- {'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
- object_entity_id
- {'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
- confidence
- {'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
- rationale
- {'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
- source_id
- {'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
- period_id
- {'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}
4 rows where period_id = "PER_ROM_IMPERIAL"
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: relationship_type
| relationship_id ▼ | subject_entity_id | relationship_type | object_entity_id | confidence | rationale | source_id | review_status | period_id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1514 | Tanit ENT_PHO_TANIT | received_as | Juno ENT_ROM_JUNO | medium | In Roman North Africa following the conquest of Carthage (146 BCE), Tanit was identified and worshipped as Juno Caelestis (the Celestial Juno). The Roman cult of Juno Caelestis at Carthage continued for centuries; her sanctuary on the Byrsa hill was one of the great temples of Roman Africa. Tertullian (Apology 24) and Augustine of Hippo mention the cult. The identification reflects shared attributes: both Tanit and Juno are queens of heaven, associated with the moon, and consorts of the chief male deity (Baal Hammon/Jupiter). Confidence medium because the identification is well-documented for the Roman period but the theological continuity between Tanit and Juno (as opposed to a superficial nomenclature overlay) is debated. | Glenn Markoe, Phoenicians (London: British Museum Press / University of California Press, 2000) SRC_MARKOE_PHOENICIANS | reviewed | Roman Imperial PER_ROM_IMPERIAL |
| 1515 | Juno ENT_ROM_JUNO | reception_of | Tanit ENT_PHO_TANIT | medium | Juno Caelestis as the Roman form of the Carthaginian Tanit; the queen of heaven's cult continued under a Roman name in North Africa through the imperial period. | Glenn Markoe, Phoenicians (London: British Museum Press / University of California Press, 2000) SRC_MARKOE_PHOENICIANS | reviewed | Roman Imperial PER_ROM_IMPERIAL |
| 1516 | Baal Hammon ENT_PHO_BAAL_HAMMON | received_as | Saturn ENT_ROM_SATURN | medium | Diodorus Siculus 20.14 explicitly calls the god of Carthage to whom children were sacrificed "Kronos," using the Greek name for Saturn. In Roman North Africa, Baal Hammon was worshipped as Saturnus Africanus; thousands of votive stelae to Saturnus from Roman North Africa continue the Baal Hammon tradition. Tertullian (Apology 9) identifies "Saturnus" as the North African deity who receives child sacrifice. The molk rite — child sacrifice to Baal Hammon — persisted in the Saturnus Africanus cult in vestigial forms. The identification reflects shared chthonic and agricultural associations: both Saturn/Kronos and Baal Hammon are associated with time, the cycles of harvest, and the demands of divine sovereignty. Confidence medium because the theological mapping is partially opportunistic (Roman interpretatio) rather than purely functional. | Glenn Markoe, Phoenicians (London: British Museum Press / University of California Press, 2000) SRC_MARKOE_PHOENICIANS | reviewed | Roman Imperial PER_ROM_IMPERIAL |
| 1517 | Saturn ENT_ROM_SATURN | reception_of | Baal Hammon ENT_PHO_BAAL_HAMMON | medium | Saturnus Africanus as the Roman form of the Carthaginian Baal Hammon; Diodorus Siculus documents the Kronos/Baal Hammon identification; the Saturnus cult in Roman North Africa continues Baal Hammon worship. | Glenn Markoe, Phoenicians (London: British Museum Press / University of California Press, 2000) SRC_MARKOE_PHOENICIANS | reviewed | Roman Imperial PER_ROM_IMPERIAL |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
[relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
[relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
[object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
[confidence] TEXT,
[rationale] TEXT,
[source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
[review_status] TEXT,
[period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);