Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

9 rows where source_id = "SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: subject_entity_id, relationship_type, object_entity_id, confidence, rationale, period_id

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
1297 Lotan ENT_CAN_LOTAN embodies Chaos ENT_CHAOS high Lotan is a chaos-serpent figure embodying primordial chaos in the Ugaritic combat myth. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed  
1366 Tiamat ENT_MES_TIAMAT aligned_with Lotan ENT_CAN_LOTAN medium Functional/typological cognate (no attested diffusion of the Mesopotamian deity into the later cult); per Burkert/West the real transmission, where any, runs through Hurrian-Hittite intermediaries. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Canaanite Bronze Age PER_CAN_BRONZE_AGE
1367 Lotan ENT_CAN_LOTAN aligned_with Tiamat ENT_MES_TIAMAT medium Functional/typological cognate, not an attested reception (the cosmic-sovereignty/chaos parallels route through Hurrian-Hittite intermediaries or are modern comparisons; Burkert, West). John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Canaanite Bronze Age PER_CAN_BRONZE_AGE
1370 Lotan ENT_CAN_LOTAN received_as Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN high Lotan (ltn, Ugaritic) is the direct linguistic and mythological cognate of Hebrew Leviathan (lwtn/lwytn). KTU 1.5 I 1–3: "When you smote Lotan the primordial serpent, annihilated the twisting serpent, the mighty one with seven heads." Isaiah 27:1 applies the same epithets to Leviathan verbatim ("Leviathan the fleeing serpent ... Leviathan the twisting serpent ... the dragon that is in the sea"). Name cognacy, description, and combat-myth role are all identical. Day 1985 pp. 1–30 and DDD_BIBLE s.v. "Leviathan" identify this as the most secure Canaanite→Israelite mythological transmission. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1371 Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN reception_of Lotan ENT_CAN_LOTAN high Leviathan as Israelite reception of Ugaritic Lotan; name, description (seven-headed twisting serpent), and combat-myth role are directly cognate. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1374 Yam ENT_CAN_YAM received_as Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN medium Yam (Ugaritic Sea/Judge-River) as storm god's chaos adversary parallels Yahweh's combat with sea and sea-monsters in Psalm 74:13–14 ("You divided the sea ... you broke the heads of the sea monsters"), Isaiah 51:9–10, Job 38. Hebrew poetry conflates chaos sea and chaos monster (Leviathan/Rahab), absorbing Yam's role as cosmic antagonist of the storm deity. Distinct from the Lotan→Leviathan chain: this transmits the storm-god/sea combat function, not the serpent's name. Day 1985 pp. 31–87 treats the Yam tradition in Israelite texts. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1375 Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN reception_of Yam ENT_CAN_YAM medium Leviathan absorbs Yam's function as chaos-sea adversary of the storm deity in Hebrew combat mythology; distinct reception path from the Lotan name cognacy. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1380 Tiamat ENT_MES_TIAMAT aligned_with Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN medium Functional/typological cognate (no attested diffusion of the Mesopotamian deity into the later cult); per Burkert/West the real transmission, where any, runs through Hurrian-Hittite intermediaries. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1381 Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN aligned_with Tiamat ENT_MES_TIAMAT medium Functional/typological cognate, not an attested reception (the cosmic-sovereignty/chaos parallels route through Hurrian-Hittite intermediaries or are modern comparisons; Burkert, West). John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);