Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

1 row where subject_entity_id = "ENT_ELAM_HUMBAN"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
2395 Humban ENT_ELAM_HUMBAN aligned_with Enlil ENT_MES_ENLIL medium Humban and Enlil are structurally parallel as the chief divine authorities of their respective civilizations in the ancient Near East — both serve as the supreme male deity whose approval legitimates royal power and whose invocation in royal inscriptions signals the highest divine sanction. As neighboring civilizations (Elam and Mesopotamia were in continuous political and cultural contact for two millennia), their chief deities occupied structurally identical positions in their respective pantheons. The Assyrian texts about Elamite kings routinely mention Humban alongside Ashur in diplomatic contexts, reflecting awareness of Humban as the Elamite equivalent of the Assyrian divine patron. Confidence medium: the parallelism is structural; the two deities were not explicitly equated by ancient commentators. Potts (1999) p. 263. Daniel T. Potts, The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State (Cambridge World Archaeology; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999) SRC_POTTS_ELAM reviewed Kingdom of Elam PER_ELAM_CLASSICAL

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);