Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

3 rows where subject_entity_id = "ENT_THRA_ZALMOXIS"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: relationship_type, confidence, source_id

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
2319 Zalmoxis ENT_THRA_ZALMOXIS patron_of Dead ENT_DEAD high The core of the Zalmoxis cult as reported by Herodotus 4.94-95: the Getae believe they do not die but go to Zalmoxis, who is their deity of immortality and afterlife. The four-year messenger ritual (throwing a man onto spears to communicate with Zalmoxis) confirms his role as the sovereign of the dead and the revealer of immortality. Herodotus 4.94-96. Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES reviewed Thracian Iron Age and Classical Period PER_THRA_IRON_AGE
2320 Zalmoxis ENT_THRA_ZALMOXIS aligned_with Orpheus ENT_ORPHEUS medium Zalmoxis and Orpheus share structural parallels as Thracian-connected mystery figures associated with afterlife, soul-doctrine, and initiatory revelation. Both traditions promise immortality through initiation and involve divine instruction about the nature of the soul. Burkert, Ancient Mystery Cults (1987) pp. 11-12 and Eliade note the Thracian mystery parallel. This alignment is scholarly and structural, not an ancient explicit equation. Zosia H. Archibald, The Odrysian Kingdom of Thrace: Orpheus Unmasked (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998) SRC_ARCHIBALD_ODRYSIAN reviewed Thracian Iron Age and Classical Period PER_THRA_IRON_AGE
2451 Zalmoxis ENT_THRA_ZALMOXIS aligned_with Dionysus ENT_DIONYSUS medium Herodotus (Hist. IV.95) preserves a tradition that Zalmoxis was a disciple of Pythagoras (almost certainly a later rationalizing legend), and Plato (Charmides 156d-157c) references Zalmoxis in the context of holistic healing and soul medicine. The structural parallel with Dionysus lies in the mystery cult form: both figures are associated with initiatory rites promising immortality or a blessed afterlife, both involve a period of disappearance and return (Zalmoxis's three-year underground sojourn; Dionysian dismemberment and return), and both cults are attested in the same Thracian-Greek cultural contact zone. Ancient writers (Mnaseas of Patrae via Diodorus Siculus) sometimes directly equated Zalmoxis with the Kronos of mystery traditions. Confidence medium: the parallel is structural and contextual rather than attested by explicit ancient identification. Herodotus, Histories (c. 430 BCE) SRC_HERODOTUS_HISTORIES reviewed Thracian Iron Age and Classical Period PER_THRA_IRON_AGE

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);