Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

16 rows where period_id = "PER_ISR_EXILIC"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: subject_entity_id, relationship_type, object_entity_id, confidence, source_id

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
1370 Lotan ENT_CAN_LOTAN received_as Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN high Lotan (ltn, Ugaritic) is the direct linguistic and mythological cognate of Hebrew Leviathan (lwtn/lwytn). KTU 1.5 I 1–3: "When you smote Lotan the primordial serpent, annihilated the twisting serpent, the mighty one with seven heads." Isaiah 27:1 applies the same epithets to Leviathan verbatim ("Leviathan the fleeing serpent ... Leviathan the twisting serpent ... the dragon that is in the sea"). Name cognacy, description, and combat-myth role are all identical. Day 1985 pp. 1–30 and DDD_BIBLE s.v. "Leviathan" identify this as the most secure Canaanite→Israelite mythological transmission. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1371 Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN reception_of Lotan ENT_CAN_LOTAN high Leviathan as Israelite reception of Ugaritic Lotan; name, description (seven-headed twisting serpent), and combat-myth role are directly cognate. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1372 Mot ENT_CAN_MOT received_as Sheol ENT_ISR_SHEOL high Mot (Death, Ugaritic) as devouring underworld power whose "throat is a pit, gullet a grave" (KTU 1.5 II 2–4) parallels Hebrew Sheol personified as appetite: "Sheol enlarges its throat and opens its mouth without limit" (Isaiah 5:14; cf. Habakkuk 2:5; Proverbs 1:12). Both are dark underworld powers described through the metaphor of an insatiable devouring mouth. DDD_BIBLE s.v. "Mot" identifies the imagery as continuous. Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible SRC_UGARIT_DDD reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1373 Sheol ENT_ISR_SHEOL reception_of Mot ENT_CAN_MOT high Sheol as Israelite reception of Ugaritic Mot; devouring underworld imagery in Hebrew poetry directly parallels Ugaritic death-god texts. Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible SRC_UGARIT_DDD reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1374 Yam ENT_CAN_YAM received_as Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN medium Yam (Ugaritic Sea/Judge-River) as storm god's chaos adversary parallels Yahweh's combat with sea and sea-monsters in Psalm 74:13–14 ("You divided the sea ... you broke the heads of the sea monsters"), Isaiah 51:9–10, Job 38. Hebrew poetry conflates chaos sea and chaos monster (Leviathan/Rahab), absorbing Yam's role as cosmic antagonist of the storm deity. Distinct from the Lotan→Leviathan chain: this transmits the storm-god/sea combat function, not the serpent's name. Day 1985 pp. 31–87 treats the Yam tradition in Israelite texts. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1375 Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN reception_of Yam ENT_CAN_YAM medium Leviathan absorbs Yam's function as chaos-sea adversary of the storm deity in Hebrew combat mythology; distinct reception path from the Lotan name cognacy. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1376 El ENT_CAN_EL received_as Yahweh ENT_ISR_YAHWEH medium Ugaritic El's divine epithets (El Elyon, El Shaddai, El Olam) appear in Genesis 14:18–22, Exodus 6:3, and Genesis 21:33 as Yahweh's own names, active before the revelation of the name Yahweh. Cross 1973 pp. 1–75 demonstrates that Yahweh began as a southern storm-warrior deity who absorbed El's cosmic role as "father of years" (ʾab šnm), "creator of creatures" (bny bnwt), and head of the divine council (pḥr ʿIlm). The shared divine council (bene elim / Bene Elohim) structure confirms the absorption. Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Harvard University Press, 1973) SRC_CROSS_CANAANITE_MYTH reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1377 Yahweh ENT_ISR_YAHWEH reception_of El ENT_CAN_EL medium Yahweh absorbed El's epithets (Elyon, Shaddai, Olam) and cosmic creator-father role; divine council in Hebrew scripture derives from El's heavenly assembly at Ugarit. Frank Moore Cross, Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic (Harvard University Press, 1973) SRC_CROSS_CANAANITE_MYTH reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1380 Tiamat ENT_MES_TIAMAT aligned_with Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN medium Functional/typological cognate (no attested diffusion of the Mesopotamian deity into the later cult); per Burkert/West the real transmission, where any, runs through Hurrian-Hittite intermediaries. John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1381 Leviathan ENT_ISR_LEVIATHAN aligned_with Tiamat ENT_MES_TIAMAT medium Functional/typological cognate, not an attested reception (the cosmic-sovereignty/chaos parallels route through Hurrian-Hittite intermediaries or are modern comparisons; Burkert, West). John Day, God's Conflict with the Dragon and the Sea (Cambridge University Press, 1985) SRC_DAY_GODS_CONFLICT reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1382 Apkallu ENT_MES_APKALLU received_as Watchers ENT_ISR_WATCHERS medium Mesopotamian Apkallu (seven antediluvian sages, semi-divine, sent by Enki to teach civilization) parallel the Watchers/Bene Elohim of Genesis 6:1–4 and 1 Enoch 6–11: both are divine beings from before the flood who transmit special knowledge to humanity and whose activity is associated with the flood as divine punishment. Black and Green (1992) document the Apkallu; Amar Annus (JNES 2010) argues for direct Apkallu→Watcher transmission during the Babylonian exile. Jeremy Black and Anthony Green, Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia SRC_BLACK_GREEN_MESO reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1383 Watchers ENT_ISR_WATCHERS reception_of Apkallu ENT_MES_APKALLU medium Watchers as possible Israelite reception of Mesopotamian Apkallu tradition; antediluvian divine sages who transmit forbidden knowledge before the flood. Jeremy Black and Anthony Green, Gods, Demons and Symbols of Ancient Mesopotamia SRC_BLACK_GREEN_MESO reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1388 Angra Mainyu ENT_ZOR_ANGRA_MAINYU received_as Satan ENT_ISR_SATAN medium In early Hebrew texts, "the satan" (the accuser) is a member of Yahweh's heavenly court (Job 1–2; Zechariah 3:1–2) — not an independent cosmic evil. The development of Satan as an independent adversarial power opposing God (1 Enoch 6–11; Jubilees 10; later Revelation) parallels the Zoroastrian Angra Mainyu (cosmic adversary of Ahura Mazda, independent evil principle). Jews under Persian/Achaemenid rule (6th–4th c. BCE) had direct access to Zoroastrian theology; Boyce and DDD_BIBLE s.v. "Satan" both discuss the probable structural influence. Confidence medium: the development could be endogenous; the influence is probable but not textually demonstrable. Mary Boyce, Zoroastrians SRC_BOYCE_ZOROASTRIANS reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1389 Satan ENT_ISR_SATAN reception_of Angra Mainyu ENT_ZOR_ANGRA_MAINYU medium Satan's development from court accuser to independent cosmic adversary shows probable structural influence from Zoroastrian Angra Mainyu during the Babylonian exile and Persian period. Mary Boyce, Zoroastrians SRC_BOYCE_ZOROASTRIANS reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1550 Utnapishtim ENT_MES_UTNAPISHTIM received_as Noah ENT_ISR_NOAH high The flood narrative in Genesis 6-9 is the most directly documented Mesopotamian→Israelite literary transmission in the dataset. The parallels between the Atrahasis Epic (c. 1700 BCE) and Gilgamesh Tablet XI on one side, and Genesis on the other, are structural and verbal: both have (1) a divine council decree to destroy humanity; (2) one righteous man warned by the sympathetic deity (Ea/Enki warns Utnapishtim; God warns Noah); (3) construction of a boat and loading of animals and family; (4) the flood; (5) the boat grounding on a mountain; (6) a sequence of birds released to test for dry land (the dove/raven sequence in Genesis 8:6-12 parallels Gilgamesh Tablet XI closely); (7) a sacrificial offering after the flood; (8) a divine oath not to repeat the destruction. Andrew George (OUP 2003) documents the parallels exhaustively in his critical apparatus. The mechanism of transmission is the Babylonian exile (586-538 BCE), when Israelite scribes had direct access to the Atrahasis and Gilgamesh traditions in Babylon. Andrew R. George, The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2003) SRC_GEORGE_GILGAMESH reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC
1551 Noah ENT_ISR_NOAH reception_of Utnapishtim ENT_MES_UTNAPISHTIM high Noah as the Israelite reception of the Mesopotamian flood hero tradition (Utnapishtim in Gilgamesh Tablet XI; Atrahasis in the Atrahasis Epic; Ziusudra in the Sumerian flood story); the Genesis narrative's detailed structural and verbal parallels demonstrate direct literary transmission through Babylonian exile contact. Andrew R. George, The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic: Introduction, Critical Edition and Cuneiform Texts, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 2003) SRC_GEORGE_GILGAMESH reviewed Exilic and Post-Exilic PER_ISR_EXILIC

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);