Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

7 rows where source_id = "SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: subject_entity_id, relationship_type, confidence

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
2349 Khaldi ENT_URA_KHALDI patron_of War ENT_WAR high Khaldi is explicitly the war deity in Urartian royal annals — every campaign is conducted "by the greatness of Khaldi" and every victory is dedicated to him. He commands military action and receives the first fruits of conquest. His war-patron function is the most extensively documented aspect of his cult across the entire Urartian inscriptional corpus. Zimansky (1985) pp. 56-80. Paul E. Zimansky, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 41; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985) SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU reviewed Kingdom of Urartu PER_URA_IRON_AGE
2350 Khaldi ENT_URA_KHALDI aligned_with Ashur ENT_MES_ASHUR medium Khaldi and Assyrian Ashur are structurally parallel: both are the supreme national war deities of rival Iron Age kingdoms (Urartu and Assyria) in direct competition for domination of the Near East. Both receive dedication of military spoils, command campaigns, and legitimate royal authority through divine choice. The rivalry is documented in Sargon II's eighth campaign letter (714 BCE), where the sacking of Khaldi's Musasir temple is framed as Ashur's victory over Khaldi. Confidence medium: the alignment is structural and adversarial, not an ancient explicit equation. Paul E. Zimansky, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 41; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985) SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU reviewed Kingdom of Urartu PER_URA_IRON_AGE
2351 Teisheba ENT_URA_TEISHEBA reception_of Teshub ENT_HTT_TESHUB high Urartian Teisheba is the direct reception of Hurrian Teshub through the Hurro-Urartian linguistic inheritance. The names correspond by regular sound change (Hurrian Teš(u)b → Urartian Teišeba), both are storm-thunder deities in the second rank of their divine triads, both are associated with the bull, and both command military conflict alongside their supreme deity. The Hurro-Urartian language family relationship (the two languages are closely related) makes this the most linguistically secure deity-to-deity connection in the Urartian layer. Zimansky (1985) pp. 68-70. Paul E. Zimansky, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 41; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985) SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU reviewed Kingdom of Urartu PER_URA_IRON_AGE
2353 Teisheba ENT_URA_TEISHEBA aligned_with Tarhunna ENT_HTT_TARHUNNA high Teisheba and Hittite Tarhunna are parallel thunder deities of neighbouring Anatolian traditions — both derive from the same deep Anatolian storm-deity complex (Proto-Anatolian *tarḫu-, "to conquer/prevail"). They occupy the same second-rank position in their divine triads and share the bull iconography. The alignment reflects the broad Anatolian storm-deity tradition that also includes Ugaritic Baal, Mesopotamian Adad, and later Zeus. Zimansky (1985) p. 69. Paul E. Zimansky, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 41; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985) SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU reviewed Kingdom of Urartu PER_URA_IRON_AGE
2354 Shivini ENT_URA_SHIVINI aligned_with Utu/Shamash ENT_MES_UTU_SHAMASH medium Shivini and Mesopotamian Utu/Shamash are parallel sun deities of neighboring ancient Near Eastern traditions. Both are depicted with a solar disk, both serve as witnesses to oaths and upholders of justice, and both occupy a third-rank position in their divine triads (after the sky deity and storm deity). The alignment reflects the shared ancient Near Eastern theology of the sun as the divine witness of justice. Zimansky (1985) p. 70. Paul E. Zimansky, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 41; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985) SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU reviewed Kingdom of Urartu PER_URA_IRON_AGE
2355 Shivini ENT_URA_SHIVINI aligned_with Sun Goddess of Arinna ENT_HTT_ARINNA medium Shivini and the Hittite Sun Goddess of Arinna are parallel Anatolian solar deities. Both are venerated as supreme solar powers in Anatolian Iron Age and Bronze Age religion; the winged sun disk iconography is shared across both traditions. Shivini occupies a structurally similar position in the Urartian triad to the Hittite solar deity in the Hittite pantheon. Zimansky (1985) p. 70; Piotrovsky (1969) p. 97. Paul E. Zimansky, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 41; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985) SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU reviewed Kingdom of Urartu PER_URA_IRON_AGE
2357 Arubani ENT_URA_ARUBANI aligned_with Shaushka ENT_HTT_SHAUSHKA medium Arubani and Hurrian/Hittite Shaushka are structurally parallel: both are the goddess associated with the supreme storm/war deity (Arubani with Khaldi; Shaushka as consort of Teshub), both are love/arts/fertility deities complementing their consort's war function. If Teisheba = Teshub through Hurro-Urartian inheritance, then Arubani as Khaldi's consort plausibly inherits the Shaushka role. Confidence medium: the comparison is structurally sound but the surviving evidence for Arubani's precise functions is thin. Zimansky (1985) p. 72. Paul E. Zimansky, Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 41; Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, 1985) SRC_ZIMANSKY_URARTU reviewed Kingdom of Urartu PER_URA_IRON_AGE

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);