Relationships

2,079 typed, source-backed relationships between entities. Each row records a directed relationship (subject → type → object) with a justifying source and rationale note. See relationship_types for the full controlled vocabulary of 70 relationship types. Key types: reception_of / received_as (transmission across traditions), equated_with (interpretatio graeca / analogues), parent_of (genealogy), member_of (collective membership), emanates_from (Gnostic/Neoplatonic structure).

Data license: MIT · Data source: jebboone/deitydb

subject_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity initiating or holding the relationship'}
relationship_type
{'description': 'Typed relationship from the controlled vocabulary (see relationship_types table)'}
object_entity_id
{'description': 'The entity receiving or targeted by the relationship'}
confidence
{'description': 'high / medium / low / speculative'}
rationale
{'description': 'Scholarly justification for the relationship, with source citations'}
source_id
{'description': 'Primary source justifying this relationship'}
period_id
{'description': 'Historical period in which this relationship is attested (null = all periods)'}

5 rows where subject_entity_id = "ENT_ELAM_KIRIRISHA"

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: relationship_type, confidence, source_id

relationship_id ▼ subject_entity_id relationship_type object_entity_id confidence rationale source_id review_status period_id
2389 Kiririsha ENT_ELAM_KIRIRISHA patron_of Fertility ENT_FERTILITY high Kiririsha is the Elamite great mother goddess whose primary domain encompasses cosmic fertility, divine motherhood, and the renewal of life. Her name ("the Great Goddess") and her Liyan cult center — associated with the Persian Gulf coast's agricultural and maritime abundance — place her in the great mother goddess tradition. The Middle Elamite royal inscriptions invoke her alongside Inshushinak and Napirisha for the protection and fertility of the Elamite state. Potts (1999) pp. 282-286. Daniel T. Potts, The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State (Cambridge World Archaeology; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999) SRC_POTTS_ELAM reviewed Kingdom of Elam PER_ELAM_CLASSICAL
2390 Kiririsha ENT_ELAM_KIRIRISHA aligned_with Inanna/Ishtar ENT_MES_INANNA_ISHTAR medium Kiririsha and Inanna/Ishtar are parallel as the dominant great goddesses of neighboring ancient Near Eastern civilizations — both are "the great goddess" of their respective traditions, both combine fertility, sovereignty, and protection functions, and both absorbed the titles and iconographic features of earlier mother goddess traditions. During periods of strong Mesopotamian cultural influence on Elam (especially the Old Elamite period of Ur III contact), Kiririsha assimilated some Inanna/Ninhursag characteristics. Confidence medium: they are parallel rather than equated, and their theological programs differ significantly in detail. Potts (1999) p. 288; Carter & Stolper (1984) p. 42. Daniel T. Potts, The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State (Cambridge World Archaeology; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999) SRC_POTTS_ELAM reviewed Kingdom of Elam PER_ELAM_CLASSICAL
2391 Kiririsha ENT_ELAM_KIRIRISHA aligned_with Anahita ENT_ZOR_ANAHITA low Kiririsha and Anahita are parallel as the principal goddess figures of the Iranian cultural sphere in successive historical periods — Kiririsha as the Elamite great goddess (c. 2200–539 BCE), Anahita as the Zoroastrian/Iranian water-and-fertility goddess (attested from the Achaemenid period). Both are associated with water, fertility, and divine protection of the Iranian world. Confidence low: the parallel is typological across a large chronological gap (the Achaemenid synthesis of Iranian and Elamite religious traditions is attested but the specific Kiririsha → Anahita transmission is scholarly inference rather than inscriptional fact. Potts (1999) p. 290. Daniel T. Potts, The Archaeology of Elam: Formation and Transformation of an Ancient Iranian State (Cambridge World Archaeology; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999) SRC_POTTS_ELAM reviewed Kingdom of Elam PER_ELAM_CLASSICAL
2392 Kiririsha ENT_ELAM_KIRIRISHA spouse_of Napirisha ENT_ELAM_NAPIRISHA high The Middle Elamite divine triad of Inshushinak, Napirisha, and Kiririsha consistently presents Kiririsha as Napirisha's divine consort. The Chogha Zanbil (Dur-Untash) complex, dedicated c. 1250 BCE, includes a temple to Kiririsha alongside the principal Inshushinak-Napirisha sanctuary — the paired placement reflects the divine spousal relationship. Royal inscriptions of the Untash-Napirisha dynasty invoke Napirisha and Kiririsha together as a divine pair. Carter & Stolper (1984) p. 47; Potts (1999) p. 252. Elizabeth Carter and Matthew W. Stolper, Elam: Surveys of Political History and Archaeology (University of California Publications, Near Eastern Studies 25; University of California Press, Berkeley / Los Angeles / London, 1984) SRC_CARTER_STOLPER_ELAM reviewed Kingdom of Elam PER_ELAM_CLASSICAL
4134 Kiririsha ENT_ELAM_KIRIRISHA parent_of Hutran ENT_ELAM_HUTRAN medium Kiririsha is the mother of Hutran in the divine triad of Anshan. Elizabeth Carter and Matthew W. Stolper, Elam: Surveys of Political History and Archaeology (University of California Publications, Near Eastern Studies 25; University of California Press, Berkeley / Los Angeles / London, 1984) SRC_CARTER_STOLPER_ELAM reviewed  

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE "entity_relationships" (
   [relationship_id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [subject_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [relationship_type] TEXT REFERENCES [relationship_types]([relationship_type]),
   [object_entity_id] TEXT REFERENCES [entities]([entity_id]),
   [confidence] TEXT,
   [rationale] TEXT,
   [source_id] TEXT REFERENCES [sources]([source_id]),
   [review_status] TEXT,
   [period_id] TEXT REFERENCES [periods]([period_id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_period_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([period_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_source_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([source_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_object_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([object_entity_id]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_relationship_type]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([relationship_type]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_entity_relationships_subject_entity_id]
    ON [entity_relationships] ([subject_entity_id]);